- No, such thought did not come to to me mind,I have involuntarily grinned.
- Excuse, it is simple I can not in any way... Perhaps it indeed has made it?
- You consider, what it was in its character? Or it had on that serious reasons?
- More likely, I would think of character, but was not present, I have told nonsense,suddenly have resolutely declared Gin.
- Why?
- It could not make it as it contradicted its vital principles.
- To which principles?
- Understand, it was not religious, in habitual sense of this word, but considered that the person should not break the basic
precepts, not from fear before any higher force that is why that any infringement of laws, involves disharmony, something is
broken in the world. He always said that it comes back to the one who has broken. And still he said that the person is free in
a choice of a course of life, but is not free to dispose of the life. Each of us comes to this world when it is necessary to it
under the supreme law and as this world should leave.
- You wish to tell, what it was in a matter of life and death the fatalist, but attached huge significance to a problem of a moral
choice?I more accurately enough putannoe have tried to formulate an explanation which has just heard, but have not
absolutely understood.